![]() |
K9joy Education |
Do You Dare to From the desk of Mogens Eliasen - first published: November 16, 2004:
It is amazing how people can argue about whether or not to feed their dogs a raw diet instead of commercially available kibble products. Here are some facts that should be considered before you attempt to participate in that discussion:
| |
Biology and physiology Dogs are carnivores - actually domesticated wolves. The genetic difference between dogs and wolves is no bigger than the genetic difference between black and white people... Dogs' gastrointestinal system cannot be told apart from that of a wolf. Wolves live and thrive on killing large prey animals, which they completely consume - hide, organs, meat, and bones all included. But wolves do not eat a lot of vegetable matter if they have any choices - and they certainly do not consume any grain products, not even from the stomachs of their prey. The fact that domestic dogs can survive on a diet that is primarily based on grain products does not in any way mean that they reach optimum health on such food. (Heavy smokers may also survive, despite their smoking, for many years. But that does not make smoking healthy...) Dogs' gastrointestinal system is mechanically, physiologically, and chemically constructed completely different from the human system. Here is a short overview of some of the most important features:
Overall, this means that what is good food for a human cannot be good food for a dog, and vice versa... Commerce and financial interests The pet food manufacturers have no interest in raw food - it is too expensive to deal with on a mass-production and mass-distribution scale. No matter what a scientist says, no scientist (or group of scientists) can know EVERYTHING there is no know about nutrition. Our understanding of what humans and dogs need is constantly developing - which means that we still do not know the end… Replacing a natural diet with one that is synthetically composed from individual man-made ingredients is doomed to be lacking in fundamental nutrients. Those we do not know anything about most probably are not in the recipe… Pet food labels are outright deceptive in regards to the information they contain about nutritional value. The analytical data presented (as dictated by law), even when the information is perfectly true, do not tell ANYTHING about the quality of the food. But they might impress a layperson that does not know what information truly can be extracted from those labels… (More about mineral analysis and labels.) Veterinarians in North America learn virtually NOTHING about carnivore nutrition in order to earn their DVM title. If they know anything about it at all, it is from personal studies, outside the curriculum. What is taught in vet schools about nutrition for dogs is typically nothing but a 2-hour lecture given by sales representatives from the pet food manufacturing industry, at no cost to the government. Veterinarians make a living on treating sick dogs, not healthy dogs. Besides, veterinarians also make big commissions on selling pet food, and they get paid for endorsing products... Veterinarians risk their license to practice if they speak their mind against their Associations, whom North American governments have granted the right to issue and revoke licenses for practicing veterinarians. The Associations are Trade Unions that primarily work for their members' financial interest; they have no mandate to serve the public interest, and they don't! The latest prominent example was in April 2004 when The American Veterinary Association refused to negotiate with the US government about abstaining from recommending yearly revaccinations for dogs. The Association left the negotiation table in protest when the government refused to discuss replacement of the income from those routine vaccinations - which account for close to half of an average veterinarian's total revenue... (More about a vet's financial dilemma.) Other people's experiences There are thousands and thousands of people having shifted from kibble to raw food during the past few years, documented through on-line newsgroups. ALL of them have noticed serious health benefits for their dogs when following through on the transition. There are no reports of raw feeders "converting back to kibble" that achieved any health benefits from doing so, unless the shift was from an inadequate and improperly balanced raw diet. Summing it up:
From here, you should be able to enter the discussion about whether or not to feed a raw diet or to trust the commercial players in their promotion of their profitable products. The call is yours. And, of course, personal experience is a major plus. Enjoy the discussion!Sincerely, Mogens Eliasen
|
The article above may be copied and published as is, when it includes the bio at the end and is not subject to commerce. The permission to copy and publish this article particularly encompasses:
You are granted up-front permission to publish this article as outlined above, without first asking. We would appreciate if you would give us your feedback on it and tell us about where you distribute it - and possibly also later let us know what kind of responses you got. The URL for it is http://k9joy.com/dogarticles/raw.php
The stats for this article are: |
Other articles of Mogens Eliasen are available from http://k9joy.com/dogarticles. |
Feedback form |
Looking for something different? If so, please let us know what you are looking for! We will be happy to take about your ideas and suggestions, and if you are searching for some specific information that we might have available or can create, we will be happy to have your input - and we will notify you of the result. |
Anders Hallgren: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: Mogens Eliasen: |
This site is presented to you by K9joy® |
![]() |
© All rights are reserved by Soverenity Enterprises Inc. |